Glaucoma Summit Extreme 2026 – Participant Evaluation Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.Quality of the eventHow useful for your professional activity did you find this event? *Not useful (1)Fairly useful (2)Useful (3)Extremely useful (4)If this activity was not useful, please explain whyLeave blank if it was useful.Overall impression of this event — Programme *Very poor (1)Poor (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)Overall impression of this event — Organisation *Very poor (1)Poor (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)Best aspect of this eventWorst aspect of this eventRelevance of the eventDid the event fulfil your educational goals and expected learning outcomes? *Not at all (1)Not much (2)Somewhat (3)Very much (4)Was the presented information well balanced and consistently supported by valid scientific evidence? *Not at all (1)Not much (2)Somewhat (3)Very much (4)How useful to you personally was each session?Name each session you attended and rate it from 1 (not useful) to 4 (extremely useful). Leave blank any session you did not attend.1st session titleUsefulness of the 1st session12341 = not useful, 4 = extremely useful2nd session titleUsefulness of the 2nd session12341 = not useful, 4 = extremely useful3rd session titleUsefulness of the 3rd session12341 = not useful, 4 = extremely useful4th session titleUsefulness of the 4th session12341 = not useful, 4 = extremely usefulSuitability of formats used during the eventWas there adequate time for discussions, questions & answers and learner engagement? *Never (1)Only rarely (2)Sometimes (3)Always / Almost always (4) of session? event Innovative elementsWays the event affects clinical practiceWill the information you learnt be implemented in your practice? *Not at all (1)Not much (2)Somewhat (3)Very much (4)Provide ONE example of how this event will influence your future practiceCommercial biasDid all faculty members provide conflict of interest declarations on the second slide? *No (1)Yes, but only a small part (2)Yes, for the majority (3)Yes, all (4)Example of biased presentationDo you agree the information was overall free of commercial and other bias? *Strongly disagree (1)Rather disagree (2)Rather agree (3)Strongly agree (4)Helping MTS improve our serviceThese last questions are for MTS only and are not part of the accreditation record.What was your level of surgical experience before attending the course? *No surgical procedures performedAssisted in the operating roomPerformed parts of a procedure under supervisionPerformed a complete procedure under supervisionPlease help us relate your answers to your previous experience.The development of my knowledge and surgical skills during these days was… *Poor (1)Average (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)How would you rate the organization of the academy? *Poor (1)Average (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)Reputation of the course *Poor (1)Average (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)How would you rate the training content? *Poor (1)Average (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)The number of lectures was *Too lowJust rightToo highThe individual lectures were *Not detailed enoughJust rightToo detailedWhat was the main reason you chose this course? *Recommendation from former participantsSocial mediaMTS WebsiteFlyers and advertisingConferences / IndustryPlease rate the quality of the surgical equipment *Poor (1)Average (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)Please rate the quality of the surgical instruments *Poor (1)Average (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)Please rate the quality of the disposable products *Poor (1)Average (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)Please rate the quality of the technical staff's service competence *Poor (1)Average (2)Good (3)Excellent (4)Do you have any suggestions for improving the quality of the course?NameSubmit
